Actually,
I am really bored to read this article, which is not because of the content but
the channel of this article. I use a Word Document to read an article from an
App. In the original article, there are some interesting videos and audios. It
even contains some hypertexts. When I click the button, there will be the extra
information. When I use Word Document, I lose all of them even the basic function.
I cannot move the scream to the left following the big yellow arrows. What I
can do is sliding the pages down without any fun.
There
is no doubt that Web 1.0 can show the content perfectly. More specifically, it
can only keep the words perfectly. There is no video, audio and people’s
comment. Web 1.0 is no longer to satisfy people’s demands including mine. If
there is only Web 1.0, it is impossible for the musicians to know audiences’
tastes using the way mentioned in the article.
If I
use Web 2.0 to read this article, I even cannot be satisfied. Now, I have
videos, audios and hypertexts. I can easily move the scream to the left. What’s
more, I can share my opinions about this article with others who read the same
article as I read. Maybe I will be happy. In fact, I am not so happy. I cannot
receive the feedbacks immediately. I am eager to get responses at the same
time. Using Web 2.0, musicians cannot design their songs in the way mentioned
in the article.
To satisfy most
people including me, Social 3.0 is created. I am really happy. I get everything
I want. I do not know when I will dissatisfy Social 3.0. What I believe is that
our technology will more advanced in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment